RELIGION: Religion

is a form of brain assault that is mental rather than physical but it is meant to damage the subjects perception of reality and is a deliberate act intended to damage the damage the mind of that individual. Certainly this is part of a religion but do not be deceived by that because, in my opinion, the organised religions have far lower standards of morality and ethics than the non religious and many things done in the name of religion involve cruelty and mental torture. There is no proof that there was ever supernatural influence on any book or doctrine but there is proof that such claims breach the laws of physics. So always ask why you should believe that and where is the proof. That it is in a book or someone told you so does not constitute proof of anything so nothing can be justified by any written words.

I do NOT accept that Islam is a religion of peace but instead seeks world domination, SO if we 'infidels' look on the Muslims with suspicion, that is their problem

Can anyone find anything slightly familiar in the text below that justifies

the shit we are getting from the muslims at the moment? http://www.barghouti.com/islam/lifecode.html

The term “Islamophobia” was invented and promoted in the early 1990s by the International Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT), a front group of the Muslim Brotherhood. Former IIIT member Abdur-Rahman Muhammad -- who was with that organization when the word was formally created, and who has since rejected IIIT's ideology -- now reveals the original intent behind the concept of Islamophobia: “This loathsome term is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliche conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.” In short, in its very origins, “Islamophobia” was a term designed as a weapon to advance a totalitarian cause by stigmatizing critics and silencing them. read more http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=777

Another senseless killing: humanist blogger Avijit Roy is hacked to death Another body on the streets of Dhaka. Fearless blogger Avijit Roy, described by his fellow blogger Asif Mohiuddin as 'the Richard Dawkins of Bangladesh', has been killed. His wife was also butchered, and is in a critical condition. We published a statement last week condemning the attack and also the Bangladeshi authorities, who according to the International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU) knew of credible death threats against Avijit. Avijit was not the first atheist blogger to die for his right to free of expression in Bangladesh. Ahmed Rajib Haider was killed the same way in 2013: cleavered and butchered in the streets of Dakha. In our statement, we urged greater international attention to the plight suffered by non-religious people in countries all over the world. This is something we have also been highlighting through the End Blasphemy Laws coalition, which points out that brave people like Anvijit are dying all the time not only at the hands of terrorists, but of states too.

The more I hear about that most illogical drivel they call Islam, the more I am inclined to fight against it! Not in a 'Fatwah' type of way but more of a Mahatma Gandhi style of reaction. I have decided that Islam and Muslims 'do not exist'. In practice, it's very simple, just ignore anyone who purports to be or is obviously a follower of the world's most corrosive so-called, religious element. Never again will I speak to or be spoken to by an obvious Muslim. Never again will I do any kind of business with a person who wears rags around their head, wears face covering or baggy trousers. (Apologies to Madness). By following this trend, we can, collectively, freeze out the undesirable elements who are making our lives a misery by their inability to think outside their chosen/instilled peculiar way of living. Join me if you will in our slow but effective degrading of the foundations that form part of their culture but NOT ours. A pox on the whole lot of them from Mr Allah, Mr Mohamed and all the others who follow.

Punishing drug users is pointless, says Home Office report!!!! What no body has ever done is to produce the actual figures on exactly how much 'ant-drug enforcement' costs! I would suggest that the cost of hundreds, probably thousands, of police chasing a few grams of class A or a bag of weed would be enormous. And for what? People will always try a 'little something' to relax or whatever, be it drinking, smoking or more extreme methods. This is a given throughout history and civilisation.(Prohibition in the USA being one of the more recent failures) Professor David Nutt was the government advisor who came up with the correct solution but the wrong answer for the government, and was summarily sacked for his comments about horse riding being more dangerous than ecstasy. Get a life and enjoy it to your own moral standards, NOT those thrust upon you by the idiots in power.